Article
September 17, 2025 9:58
Reading time: 0min
“I’ve worked on more M&A deals than I can count and in almost everyone, the same dynamic shows up:
The deal gets the spotlight. The integration gets the leftovers.
For Financial Services organisations, this is where the real value or the real risk lies. It’s not just about cost savings or increased market share. It’s about whether the integration is smooth, compliant, and delivers the outcomes your board, regulators, and customers expect.
Here are a few things I’ve learned from the inside that leaders often don’t see until it’s too late:
1. Culture is measurable, and it should be.
Most leaders acknowledge cultural issues post-deal, but very few take a structured approach before the deal closes.
We now have tools to assess cultural alignment in the same way we measure financial or operational fit. But too often, this is left to gut feel or leadership chemistry. That’s a mistake.
Cultural mismatches don’t just cause churn, they stall decision-making and fracture accountability.
We advise clients to conduct cultural due diligence as standard, not as a soft, post-deal task.
✅ Client takeaway: Consider culture like you consider credit risk: measurable, modellable, and manageable, if done early.
2. Tech integration isn’t just IT’s problem, it’s a business continuity risk.
Financial Services organisations are especially exposed here: legacy systems, data silos, regulatory fragmentation. And yet, many executive teams still delegate this to "the tech leads" and move on.
Integration delays here often lead to:
IT systems should be reviewed alongside commercial strategy, not in a separate track.
✅ Client takeaway: Treat IT integration as a board-level risk item, not a line item in the programme plan.
3. Regulatory alignment takes longer than expected and costs more.
Whether it’s aligning conduct standards, risk models, or reporting structures, regulatory harmonisation is one of the most underestimated challenges in Financial Services M&A.
You don’t just need a legal tick-box. You need experienced people who understand the nuance between regimes particularly if you operate across borders or have different regulatory exposures (e.g. combining retail and institutional banking).
✅ Client takeaway: If you’re not already embedding compliance leads into the integration team, you’re exposed.
4. Clients will start shopping around quietly.
One of the most valuable insights we share with FS clients is this: your clients won’t complain. They’ll just leave. Especially in private wealth, institutional banking, and insurance.
We often see client churn spike before integration is technically “live.” Why? Uncertainty. Silence. Lack of reassurance. Competitors take full advantage.
Client Relationship Managers need to be part of your IMO. Not an afterthought.
✅ Client takeaway: Assume your clients are being poached and plan accordingly.
5. Synergies are often over-promised and under-owned.
Most FS deals present synergy numbers that look great in board decks. But here’s the thing no one owns them.
Is it ops? Finance? Technology? If synergy tracking isn’t clear and accountable, it won’t happen.
We’ve helped clients stand up Synergy PMOs, dedicated workstreams to monitor and deliver value. It’s not a luxury; it’s essential.
✅ Client takeaway: If synergies matter to your shareholders, assign ownership or you risk under-delivering.
What This Means for You
If you’re:
...you need more than a solid plan. You need the right people, at the right moments, to protect value.
That might mean:
At Adams + Oliver, our role is to help you access that talent quickly and precisely, people who’ve done this before, who understand Financial Services, and who can help you avoid learning things the hard way."
Posted in:
If you’d like to have a conversation about where your M&A plans might need extra support, we’d be happy to share what we’re seeing across the market.
Get in touch